He is also the namesake of Platonic love and the Platonic solids. His most famous contribution is the Theory of forms, which has been interpreted as advancing a solution to what is now known as the problem of universals. He raised problems for what later became all the major areas of both theoretical philosophy and practical philosophy. Plato was an innovator of the written dialogue and dialectic forms in philosophy. According to Alexander of Miletus quoted by Diogenes of Sinope his actual name was Aristocles, son of Ariston, of the deme Collytus ( Collytus being a district of Athens). Plato (or Platon) was a pen name derived, apparently, from the nickname given to him by his wrestling coach – allegedly a reference to his physical broadness. In Athens, Plato founded the Academy, a philosophical school where he taught the philosophical doctrines that would later become known as Platonism. Plato ( / ˈ p l eɪ t oʊ/ PLAY-toe Greek: Πλάτων Plátōn 428/427 or 424/423 – 348/347 BC) was an ancient Greek philosopher born in Athens during the Classical period in Ancient Greece. Herein lies also the ethical significance of attunement as a virtue.Virtually all subsequent Western philosophy The reason is that love requires moral attentiveness to the reality of particular others, on account of which one can also address oneself in an authentic way. I also argue that Murdoch’s notion of moral attention in creating opportunities for self-cultivation in ‘just and loving’ vision does not reduce down to a Kantian-like respectful recognition of autonomy or rational agency of others as such. This, if I am right, brings into view a new perspective on opportunities for self-cultivation for the “inner” moral life that moves beyond both the Aristotelian influence in virtue theory, which states that character formation largely takes place in childhood, in a way that also complements developmental perspectives on character in the psychological literature. I argue that there is an essentially relational dimension to realistic and continuous self-cultivation in concept application that is helpfully understood in terms of virtue. This paper examines the implications of Iris Murdoch’s distinctive conception of moral perception as a form of ‘vision’ for the robust realist claim that salient concepts of an individual’s life-world can be revelatory of value. This, if I am right, brings into view a new perspective on the so-called companions in guilt strategy in metaethics. Instead, I argue that there is an essentially relational dimension to realistic and continuous self-cultivation in concept application that is helpfully understood in terms of virtue. I question the underlying motivation for holding that conventional norms that pertain to speech are themselves moral norms in developing a metaethical view of moral value (see Cuneo, 2014). This paper examines the implications of Murdoch’s distinctive conception of moral perception as a form of ‘vision’ revelatory of value for recent companions in guilt arguments for moral objectivism from thick evaluative concepts and speech act theory. Iris Murdoch both argues that perceptual experience itself can be evaluatively significant, and that the best way of making sense of this claim is to say that experience is shaped by the concepts that subjects possess and deploy as situated historical agents with a stance upon the world. When properly understood, Murdoch's account of love opens up conceptual space for an alternative approach to some of the central questions in contemporary moral theory. It is in navigating the tension between these two objects that we find ourselves facing what Murdoch famously described as " the extremely difficult realization that something other than oneself is real ". Here, I present a reading of Murdoch's account of love as a form of Platonic eros directed toward two objects: the Good and the particular individual. We will not understand what Murdoch is trying to do unless we understand her position as a radical alternative to such theories. In this paper, I argue that the concept of love is essential to any adequate understanding of Murdoch's work, but that recent attempts by Kieran Setiya and David Velleman to assimilate Murdoch's account of love to neo-Aristotelian or neo-Kantian theories of moral agency are misconceived. Despite this revival, however, certain aspects of Murdoch's views remain poorly understood, including her account of a concept that she famously described as " central " to moral philosophy – i.e. In the last few years, there has been a revival of interest in the philosophy of Iris Murdoch.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |